Best AI wedding speech generators, ranked

Speechy sits at the premium end of the market at $65, with a 45-minute form that is more detailed than most, and professional speechwriters reviewing and refining output before delivery. The result is three drafts in the 700 to 1,300 word range -- long enough to be a real speech, short enough to stay inside a 5-minute window. The human-in-the-loop element is what justifies the price for buyers who are uncomfortable relying fully on AI.

Honest weakness: The 45-minute form is a commitment. If you have less time or a tighter budget, the value proposition narrows. See our full SpokenVow vs Speechy breakdown.

Verble uses a conversational chat interface to gather information, then generates a speech draft at a reasonable price point. Its most distinctive feature is the practice center, which includes a teleprompter -- something no other tool in this category offers. If the writing is good but the delivery is what you are worried about, Verble has an edge.

Honest weakness: The conversational interview is shallower than SpokenVow's multi-phase approach. Speech quality reflects that. See our full comparison.

Built by Jen Glantz, a known figure in the professional bridesmaid space, this tool carries real brand authority. The conversational AI handles over 12 different speaker roles -- best man, maid of honor, father of the bride, officiant, and others -- which is a wider net than most competitors cast. The brand credibility and role breadth make it a strong option for people who are reassured by a recognizable name behind the product.

Honest weakness: At $35, it costs more than Verble and AI Wedding Toast without a meaningfully deeper interview process. The brand is the main differentiator over similarly priced options.

AI Wedding Toast runs on GPT-4, delivers three drafts, and includes a money-back guarantee -- a combination that makes it the strongest option at the $20 price point. The form-based approach means the interview is limited in depth, but the guarantee removes the financial risk from trying it. For someone with a smaller budget who still wants multiple draft options, this is the clearest choice in the tier.

Honest weakness: Form-based input means the output is only as good as what you remember to type. No editing environment beyond what you receive.

ToastWiz delivers four drafts via email, powered by GPT-4, which is more options than most competitors provide. For people who want to combine parts of different drafts into a final version, having four starting points is genuinely useful. Pricing is mid-tier at $39.90.

Honest weakness: Pricing has been inconsistent across different versions of the site, which raises questions. Drafts arrive by email rather than in an editor. See our ToastWiz comparison.

WeddingSpeech.ai has strong SEO presence and a clean form-based experience. At $19.99, it sits in the budget tier with AI Wedding Toast. The output is serviceable for straightforward speeches where the speaker has a clear idea of what they want to say and just needs help structuring it. The site is well-organized and the process is fast.

Honest weakness: Form-based input limits personalization. High SEO visibility does not always reflect output quality -- this one ranks on reach rather than depth.

Provenance is ceremony-first. It is built for wedding vows, officiant scripts, and ceremony readings -- not reception speeches. Within that narrower scope, it does the job well and the free tier is genuinely useful. If you are writing vows or need an officiant script, Provenance is the strongest option in this list for that specific task.

Honest weakness: Not the right tool for a best man speech, maid of honor speech, or any reception toast. Its ceremony focus is both its strength and its limitation.

Wordwell AI is fine-tuned specifically on wedding speeches rather than using a general-purpose language model, which gives its output a different texture than most tools in this category. The free entry tier produces a draft in around 60 seconds. For someone who wants to see what AI can do before committing money, it is a reasonable first stop.

Honest weakness: Speed comes at the cost of depth. A 60-second output requires minimal input, which means minimal personalization. Best used as a starting point rather than a finished draft.

WeddingSpeechBuilder is not an AI tool. It is a template library with a very low annual price. If you want to write your own speech and just need structural guidance, a starting framework, or a set of prompts to get you going, it does that job at minimal cost. The $16 price point reflects what it is: a resource for self-directed writers, not a writing tool.

Honest weakness: No AI. No personalization. What you put in is what you get, which means the quality of the result depends entirely on the writer. Not a fit for someone who needs help generating content from scratch.

Is AI actually good enough for a wedding speech?

It depends on the tool and how much it knows about you going in. A generic AI prompt -- "write me a best man speech for John and Sarah" -- will produce something readable but hollow. The better AI tools work more like a ghostwriter: they interview you first, pull out the specific details that make a speech memorable, and then write from that material. When the interview is done well, the output can be genuinely moving. The tells that make AI speeches sound flat (vague emotion words, no specific stories, filler phrases like "words cannot express") come from tools that skip the interview step.

How much should I pay for an AI wedding speech generator?

Anywhere from $20 to $45 is a reasonable range for a solid AI-generated speech. Free tools exist but tend to produce short, low-detail output that requires heavy editing. Above $45, you should be getting either human writer involvement (like Speechy) or a meaningfully deeper interview process. Paying $65 for what is essentially a long form with AI on the back end is not good value. Pay for depth of interview, not just price tier.

What is better -- a form or a conversational interview?

Conversational interviews tend to produce better output because they can ask follow-up questions based on what you say. A static form asks the same questions to everyone, which means it will surface the same types of answers. A good conversational tool can notice when you mention something specific ("we met at a lacrosse tournament in 2018") and follow up -- which is exactly how a human ghostwriter would work. That said, a very thorough form (like Speechy's 45-minute version) can rival a shallow conversational tool. Interview quality matters more than format.

Can I edit the speech after it is generated?

Most tools deliver a finished draft with some ability to revise, but the level of control varies significantly. Some email you a document. Others give you an in-app editor. SpokenVow includes a full in-browser editor so you can adjust phrasing, swap lines, and fine-tune tone without starting over. If you know you will want to tinker -- and most people do -- make sure the tool you pick has editing tools built in, not just a PDF download.